The Conversation is Stale about Fixing our Broken Democracy

I did a search for “Fixing our Broken Democracy” on Google. The top results are stale. We already know them. They have good ideas, but no real path to get them implemented.

#1 – A 36-minute YouTube video from February, 2015 called Fixing Our Broken Democracy by Paul Lauenstein. It’s about Move to Amend, a constitutional amendment saying money is not speech and corporations are not people.

#2 – The search phrase isn’t even on this page on the site of the Communication Workers of America. The page is about the 1% silencing their voices and the link between rights at work and political rights.

#3 – A June, 2014 Huffington post article titled: How to Fix our Broken Democracy. It discusses some important concepts in the history of politics, and says we need to balance them, but doesn’t offer a solution.

#4 – A book called:  Fixing our broken democracy: The case for ‘Total Representation’. It proposes a way to give losing votes in an election some weight, and is focused on the UK. It’s an important concept. But implementing it will probably first require fixing democracy.

#5 – A 2009 paper by an engineer at Columbia University. It’s about money in politics, fraud, plurality voting and a bit more. It’s nicely written, but goes along the lines of the usual answers.

#6 – An article on BillMoyers.com: Five bills to help fix our broken democracy – They could help a bit, but they’d first need help getting passed.

#7 – The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU has their page: Is Democracy Broken. It has similar ideas about elections and voting.

#8 – An article on Medium by John Lisney advises citizenship education, more hands-on issues and events (vague), and re-thinking elections. This last intrigued me. But he quickly concludes that elections are all that is possible, so we should get more young people to vote.

#9 – A pointer to a now-finished workshop on fixing democracy.  It seems to have been about money in elections and corporate personhood.

#10 – An European idea- get more young people to vote.

#11 – The Green Party on the topic, with a host of the usual ideas, plus advocating changes to help third parties.

#12 – An article about the UK supporting instant-runoff elections.

After these were articles about fixing our voting system and fixing immigration. And many thousands followed. So far, PeopleCount seems unique. Please add your email address to our announcement list.

This entry was posted in Flaws by Rand Strauss. Bookmark the permalink.

About Rand Strauss

Rand Strauss is the Founder of PeopleCount.org, a nonpartisan plan to enable the public to communicate constructively with each other and government by taking stands on crucial political issues. It will enable us to hold government accountable and have it be an expression of our will. Connect with Rand and PeopleCount.org on Facebook. Or leave a comment on an article (they won't display until approved.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *