Words are not Powerful

Adam Smith put a quote on his Facebook page:

Words are singularly the most powerful force available to humanity. We can choose to use this force constructively with words of encouragement, or destructively using words of despair. Words have energy and power with the ability to help, to heal, to hinder, to hurt, to harm, to humiliate and to humble. – Yehuda Berg

And then he added a link to an article he wrote about the power of encouragement.

The article was good. But the quote above it was mistaken.

If you’re read my blog, you know I have a solution for our political problems. It came from distinguishing “political accountability” and real accountability. There’s incredible power in distinguishing. So let’s use it on words.

I don’t mean to criticize Yehuda Berg. The quote is fine. And its effect on people is good. But words aren’t powerful. There’s even more power to be gained if we find where the real power is coming from.

Words are not powerful

Words are actually powerless. Write them down. If no one sees them, they’re powerless. Yes, they sometimes seem to have a little power from the act of writing them and then seeing what you wrote. But it’s just a little.

So is it that they’re heard? No- if my dog hears them, they’re also powerless. Read the Declaration of Independence to him. There’s no power in hearing the words. Or read it to someone who knows no English. Again, the words have no power.

But if you show the written words to someone who reads English, they might have some power. And if you speak them over the phone, with intonation and expression, they could have more. And if you are face-to-face with someone, they have even more power. Why do the same words have different power not just for different people, but with different modes of delivery? It’s not the words.

It’s the listening

It’s the listening that gives them power. And most people listen better when they listen than when they read. And most people listen even better when you’re with them and expressive.

If you listen to something with the attitude “I already know this stuff”, you’ll probably get little out of it. Listen with “There’s some kind of gold here” and the words will have much more effect. People have the power.

What if the listener doesn’t make the words powerful?

Adam’s article was about words of encouragement. Have you ever encouraged someone, but your words had no effect?

  • How was the person listening to you?
  • Who are you to them that they listen to you like that?
  • Who did you want to be?
  • What happened that there’s a difference?

It’s tough to know what’s happening with someone else. How about with you?

Have you ever heard words of praise or encouragement that made little difference to you? How were you listening?

What if you determine the power of the words you hear?

What if you were the cause of how powerful other people’s words seem?

Let’s do an experiment. Read this page like there’s a wonderful new idea here. Real gold. Can you listen in a way that makes those words powerful?

Power comes from you, both the power of words and the power in politics. And if you’re silent, others’ voices will seem more powerful.

Similarly, our political system has almost no way for you to exert power. And in this system, most of us are listening like we’re powerless. We make it true. Support a small change that’ll make you, and other citizens, politically powerful.

Trump is a Willing Partner with the Devil

Not too long ago, Trump implied that someone should shoot Hillary to stop her from appointing Supreme Court justices. On another site, one user defended this remark, saying:

Trump hasn’t said anything out loud that hasn’t been hinted at, whispered and talked around by countless others in the Tea-publi-con party over the past several decades.

Bring evil to the surface

I agree. And that’s why I believe it’s good that Trump is running. It’s good to air this evil. While it was underground, it just circulated among the weak-minded. In the public sphere, we can add good and thoughtful perspectives. Even wisdom. They’ll hear bits of it and finally have a little choice.

Trump is doing America a great service. Newt Gingrich and Roger Ailes nurtured a great evil in seeking power and money at all costs. They sacrificed morality, including truth, honesty, decency, and civility. They built a culture that trains people not to question lies. They built a culture of hatred and anger, a force dividing and weakening America. Instead of this mostly circulating among right-wing extremists who justify it, Trump has elevated it to center stage.

In this election, evil is competing for dominance. And it has a chance of winning. We can’t even rely on our usual trust in a father figure to save us. Up against this evil is a woman who has been maligned in every way imaginable. They’ve been cultivating this hatred of her for a long time. It has even corrupted many who are outside their party. And they’re partnering with bigotry, sexism, homophobia and xenophobia.

The Devil’s place in Trump’s campaign

Assume for a moment that the Devil is real. Pope Francis says, the Devil draws us into negativity, cynicism, and meanness of spirit– essential elements of Trump’s campaign. Couple with this two of the seven deadly sins. Their pride lets them judge based solely on their feelings, just as Trump’s pride let’s him brag about his “greatness”. And Trump fuels their anger, aims it at critics, even entertains with it and shares thoughts of violence.

This election seems to be about Trump. But behind that, it’s about the forces of negativity, evil, and poor judgement. And while some may say that it’s about frustration with “the system,” Republican strategists have been obstructing the system for a long time, fueling people’s frustration instead of advocating positive changes that could make a difference.

The ends don’t justify the means

I’ve heard a few people justify voting for Trump because he says he’ll clean up immigration, protect American interests, create jobs, and make America win. I see little correlation between what he says and his campaign’s policy positions. Nor do I see in his character what he’ll need to support legislation through Congress. But even if I saw a hope of him doing good for America, the ends don’t justify us embracing evil.

A vote for Trump is a vote to condone evil. He violates civility, promotes negativity and meanness, and is willing to ridicule critics. A vote for Trump is a vote to nurture hatred and provoke anger. Let’s not allow our desperation for greatness entice us to partner with the Devil.

If PeopleCount can manage to launch, we’ll definitely let you vote on some of the issues Trump has raised. Whether or not we begin to hold our officials accountable, let’s elect someone who’s committed in both words as well as actions in having America be on the side of good.

Free Market Ideology Perverts Democracy

Professor Jason Stanley wrote an interesting essay on how America’s free market ideology perverts democracy. A coarse summary of his essay might be this: Americans mistake “free market” competition for freedom. Even in politics, we’re out-competed by wealthy corporations. But we don’t complain because we think that’s freedom. He says:

Free market ideology uses democratic vocabulary as propaganda, obscuring a non-democratic reality. 

It’s an interesting article. You’re welcome to share your thoughts about it in the comment sections.

But the very last sentence is off the mark:

Voters are using the proper tool – elections – to make their concerns heard. Will anyone listen?

That’s like saying neanderthals used the proper tools, rocks, to sharpen sticks. Just because that’s the only tool they had doesn’t mean it’s a very good one, or the “proper” one.

Do you feel expressed by voting?

Do you feel like the election makes your voice heard? I don’t. There are good candidates I can’t vote for because only a Democrat or Republican can win. And a vote for a candidate certainly doesn’t express my position on ten different opinions.

Are you one of those people who thinks America should have a larger military budget? Or a much smaller one? How will you make that desire heard in the upcoming election? Of course, you won’t.

Elections don’t make our voices heard.

Voters can’t use elections to make their concerns heard. That’s like sitting down in a restaurant with a huge buffet with tons of scrumptious foods. Two waiters come over to bring you your food. You’re not allowed to say anything, just to point and choose which of the waiters will go fill a plate for you.

Except it’s worse than that. Waiter A likes to give lots of sweets. Waiter B likes you to eat healthy. What we’re going to do is have everyone at the table vote on which waiter will serve everyone. That’s how you get to express yourself in elections. That doesn’t make our concerns heard.

Elections can only work if the person elected forgets about his or her party and not only tries to represent all the people, but succeeds. Given the control of our politics by the wealthy, there’s not even a chance of that happening. Even if they try, we’re not coherently expressing ourselves, so at best they could only try.

What if we had a real way to express ourselves politically? And what if it was part of a system that delivered true accountability to citizens?

Please join us in creating this. Please add your name to our announcement list and donate a few dollars.

Comparing Sports to Politics, for Integrity and Accountability

In this article we’re going to continue the first one, comparing political campaigns and the election to sports.

Sports: The competition IS the work

One difference: When sports players are competing, they’re working. This single-focus helps the players stay true to their quest. 

A politician’s real work starts when the competition is over. And good representation is useless without winning, so after the contest politicians are working as much to prepare for the next competition and they do on representation. So if winning conflicts with representing us well, what do you expect to happen?

Sports: The rules and goals are clear

Another difference: In basketball, the rules are clear. The goals are clear. 

In politics, what are the rules? How can a politician win? What earns points? Clearly winning the election is important. But once the competition is over, it’s all muddy. Is the goal “serving the people?” Or maybe “representing our true interests.” Or “crafting good bills and compromises” and “supporting good solutions?” How do we measure those? Do we even measure them? In a system where there’s no real accountability and the goals and rules are muddy, you wouldn’t expect to find either good performance or integrity. Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised that those are missing in Congress.

Sports: The teams are clear

And on a sports team, everyone on the team is coordinating for the effort to be successful.

Getting something passed in Congress is like herding cats. Imagine playing basketball on a playground where there are 12 different hoops. You get the ball close to hoop and then your teammate runs the ball to another hoop. Or he and a guy from the opposing team work together to get the ball to a different hoop. It’s a weird game.

Transparency

A player’s responsibilities are clear. And they perform in full view of a huge audience. And cameras! There are even referees!

What does my representative do? I don’t know. Congress seems stuck and needs a new culture, new expectations, new rules. I don’t hear her talking about those things. But she doesn’t say much. I can go to her website and read nice things, but no specific promises.

Accountability

A player is accountable to the coach and the team owner. They guide the player. Or they can sit down and decide together what they want and how to achieve it. The coach and the owners have expectations. They ask: What happened? And they get answers. The player gives promises. The opinions of the coach and team owner matter. And they can fire the player.

My representative is not actually accountable to me. I can help hire or fire her once every two years. I can’t guide her. I certainly have no way to expect results, like a boss can. I can’t judge her and reward her with a grade, like a teacher does to a student. She’s not accountable to me. Or really, to anyone, though she certainly tries to be.

Worse, she IS accountable to the party. And she is probably accountable to her big donors. She’s a well-liked incumbent so there’s really no competition. Plus she has plenty of funds in her war chest.

What we need is a new game

In the next article, we’ll see we just need a new game. Some new rules could easily make Congress more functional. In the meantime, please add your email address to our announcement list.

Integrity is much higher in Sports than in Politics in America- Why?

Integrity is much better in sports than in politics. Let’s look at why. This will be the first of four articles looking at changing the game of politics, especially with Congress.

A friend of mine wrote on Facebook (slightly edited):

– – Right now, the Warriors are playing Oklahoma City. They are in the Playoffs. .. I hope they go to the Finals, but right now, they’re in the Playoffs.
– – You don’t get to the Finals by having temper tantrums and declaring yourself the winner. You don’t get to the Finals by convincing the public you deserve it or it’s your turn. The Warriors will get to the Finals if and only if they beat Oklahoma City fair and square.

– – God help us if the NBA has more integrity than the DNC.

 

There’s more integrity in sports

I think it’s pretty obvious there’s more integrity in sports than in politics. In sports, they promise to play their best game and win. When they lose, they’ve broken their word. Yet they still honor their word. They admit they tried hard to win, but they lost. They start looking at how they could train harder or play better or smarter. They’re committed and devoted. And their bonuses are tied to their performance.

Politics is messy

In politics, it’s hard to tell what they’re doing. It looks to me like they’re vying for power instead of representing the people. It looks to me like they’re authoring sound bites and raising funds to try and convince constituents rather than listening to them. It looks to me like they’re trying to make each other wrong instead of trying to work out solutions.

And how do they win? 90% of campaigns that raise the most money win. And mostly, those are incumbents. Other than that, it seems to be based on the party prejudices of the electorate.

 It’s time to design the political game

What if politics could be redesigned? What if it could be redesigned to be accountable?

Accountability is a relationship. If politicians were accountable to citizens, then citizens would be like an employer or a teacher:

  • Citizens would guide politicians
  • Citizens would expect results
  • Citizens would ask for reports
  • Politicians would report progress and plans- perhaps monthly
  • Citizens would grade them

What if we designed a system to deliver this? Would you play? Please say yes and add your name to our announcement list.

In the next article, we’ll look at some specific comparisons between sports and politics.

The Difference between a Republic and a Democracy

In a Facebook discussion, someone objected to my saying that America is no longer a democracy. They said it was never intended to be. It was always intended to be a republic. And they pointed to this piece, on the difference between a democracy and a republic.

Democracy or Republic?

They define a republic as a “constitutional democracy”. It limits the majority rule to not trespass on individual rights. They say a republic IS democratic, but is not “a democracy”. To them, in a democracy, the majority, even 51%, has absolute power.

Technically, America was meant to be a republic.

  1. That definition of “democracy” is not common parlance. I looked it up in websters.com (democracy, republic) and thefreedictionary.com (democracy, republic). They list no such distinction. The definition of democracy in the latter does have “majority rule” as the 4th definition. And it is absent from the definition of republic.
  2. In the US, a super-majority can change the constitution.
  3. The main point- no one’s arguing for 51% rule or an end to constitutional law.
    In America, the people no longer have power.

Today America is neither a democracy nor a republic.

We have a political system that creates laws for those with money and power. Or so said the 2014 Princeton study. America is not a republic and hasn’t been one for years. (I think their study went back to the 1970’s)

Second in power to those with money are the parties, with their gerrymandering and their control of the primaries and their refusal to consider a fair voting system. Third would be the media, though many would argue they’re controlled by the wealthy as well.

The people can be restored to power

PeopleCount is designed to restore the people to power. It will rejuvenate representative government to represent the people. Today our representatives represent whoever they want. In the above technical terms, it will restore the republic.

Today our elected officials are not accountable to the people. Accountability is a relationship that involves influence and control, reporting, and the power to judge in a way that makes a difference, and to fire and hire. The people have none of these.

Please take a stand for restoring your place as a citizen as the primary power in our republic. Please add your name to our announcement list.

There’s More to Politics than Power

Someone on Quora asked:  Is power the only thing that matters in politics?
My answer:

Different things Matter to Different People

Nothing matters in itself. Different things matter to people. And people bring those concerns to politics.

For any given person, what matters? Some want power- they want to be the representative or the president. But what really matters is, Why?

Some people REALLY want to serve, to make a difference, and they think they can do it best if they have power.

Some people REALLY want their way about something- make government smaller, take care of the poor, stop an injustice – whether they think the injustice is the imposition of taxes are they think it’s inequity.

Some people REALLY want to make someone else wrong. They want to get back at all those so-and-so’s who did such-and-such.

Some people REALLY want to feel safe, whether it’s safe from hand-guns or safe from burglars or safe from Islam.

And some people have these concerns for a few minutes as they drive home from a job. Others have them while they work in politics, on campaigns, in movements, on PR. Others have them while they campaign for office, or while they sit in office.

To many people, cooperation matters. To many, fairness and fair play matter. Often though, it seems like politicians just want to get elected. Often is seems they’ll do anything, that the ends justify the means, any means. Often it seems the ends justify immorality, such as lying or falsifying vote counts.

Different things Matter to Different People, not just Power

So lots and lots and lots of other things matter in politics. And different things matter to different people

And “power” is very ill-defined. Clinton wanted the power of the presidency. But as president, he didn’t lead us to war against the Taliban because he lacked the power of “political capital”, support from the people. “Power” is often something that’s not real, but felt, as confidence. And it’s something we say is present when someone causes people to act.

In America, the Constitution says The People have the ultimate power. But we can’t use it, so the wealthy and the parties wield it instead.

In about 3 months we, The People, will be able to start using it. Listen for it. Add your name to our announcement list.

Self-Definition is Key to Creating Political Accountability for Democracy

Self-definition is key to creating political accountability. If politicians don’t buy into a rigorous, workable definition of political accountability, including defining themselves as accountable to citizens, it’s not going to happen.

Example of how Self-Definition Determines our Actions

Recently a consultant gave me a free hour of consulting. It was interesting and valuable. Plus he ended up being enthusiastic about PeopleCount and suggested we contact a particular wealthy person who lived near him. I asked if he knew this wealthy person, if he had some contact information. No, but he was connected to him on Facebook. And on Facebook, I was connected to this consultant.

So after the call I went on Facebook and found the wealthy person and sent him a message. There was no reply. On Facebook, one has to make special effort to see messages from non-friends, so people often don’t see them. So after a few days I asked the consultant if he’d send the wealthy person a message introducing me. He begged off, saying he didn’t know this person well enough. I said it was just a short message- that he liked what we’re up to. What was he committed to, a better world, or the idea that he had to know the person well to introduce me to him?

The consultant basically answered that he didn’t work for me. Sigh…

About a week later, he sent me another reply on Facebook. It was supportive and appreciative, and encouraged me to keep making requests. So I sent him a reply to please let it be a quick, little task that’s easy to do. (I haven’t received a reply yet…)

Conclusion: Our Self-Definition supports the world we know, not the world we want

My point is that however my request occurred to him, it was all due to his self definition. He felt it wasn’t appropriate to make the introduction. Why? Because of how he viewed himself and the world. And he believed the feeling instead of overcoming it. He had feelings consistent with his rules of survival as a consultant and a shy social animal. He believed those instead of creating himself in a world he’d prefer, where one can turn on strangers to great opportunities.

I get such stuff all the time from people when I explain how PeopleCount.org will work. All we need is a definition of political accountability to constituents that’s much more complete, and a structure that allows us to act in accordance with that definition. It’d help a lot if these new actions were rewarding both to us citizens as well as to politicians. And that’s what PeopleCount.org delivers.

Please join us. Put your email address on our announcement list and join us when we start our beta, in the next few months.

We’re Wasting our Power because Political Accountability is Missing

People have the ultimate power, in America. But with political accountability missing, we are wasting our power. It feels like we’re powerless.

We’re Wasting our Power Battling Ourselves

David Brooks’ recent column about The Anxieties of Impotence says it well:

The Republican establishment thinks the grass roots have the power but the grass roots think the reverse. The unions think the corporations have the power but the corporations think the start-ups do. Regulators think Wall Street has the power but Wall Street thinks the regulators do. The Pew Research Center asked Americans, “Would you say your side has been winning or losing more?” Sixty-four percent of Americans, with majorities of both parties, believe their side has been losing more.

The problem isn’t that others are actually powerful. The problem is that we’re wasting our power. We have plenty of power, but we squander it on petty squabbles. We dissipate it constantly by battling ourselves. We organize it on party lines  instead of issue by issue.

No One is Coming to Save Us

Brooks does what we all commonly do in a moment like this. We pray for a savior:

To address these problems we need big, responsible institutions (power centers) that can mobilize people, cobble together governing majorities and enact plans of actions. In the U.S. context that means functioning political parties and a functioning Congress.

Whether one is hoping for a religious messiah, a narcissistic demagogue trumpeting his anger, government imposing order or, as in this case, rejuvenated parties or a miraculously functional legislature, it’s a plea for a savior.

No one’s coming to save us. The president is trying. The next president will try. But putting your anger and hopes into a partisan leader rarely works. Simply stop wasting your own power. The first step is to stop supporting your party and stop opposing the other party.

We have Each Other, and that’s Enough

While no one’s coming to save us, the good news is that we’re not alone. We have each other. We have a pretty healthy and prosperous society. We have a lawful society and a pretty healthy legal system. There are no riots in the streets. No army is threatening to either run amok or seize control. We are in this together. Many of us are well educated. Most of us are well meaning. Most of us are not members of the angry right, the far left or the wild western separatist movement. And most of us have computers or cell phones or can borrow one. Much is possible.

If nothing new comes along, we’ll have an election. If nothing systemic changes, Congress will continue to muddle along. We’ll still have groups like NoLabels.org pulling for Congress and the President to be “problem solvers” rather than partisan ideologues or non-thinking “deciders.” And we have groups like Voice of the People (VOP.org) pulling Americans of all stripes together in its deliberative democracy exercises to build widely acceptable solutions.

PeopleCount will give us a New Chance to Work Together

And, with a little support from you, PeopleCount will be the new thing that changes everything. It’ll let us focus our power into political accountability. We’ll naturally organize our power around issues instead of parties. Instead of wasting our power fighting each other, it will be focused into guiding Congress. America will be able to move forward. Our impotence will disappear and our anxiety will dissipate.

Please give your support. We’ll be running a crowdfunding campaign in April or May, but please put your email address on our announcement list and consider making half of your donation now.

Take responsibility for our future and create that solution. Create a system to harness your wasted power. Support PeopleCount.

To Design our Future is the Purpose of Politics. The Purpose of Government is Building it

Accountability is key to enabling us to design our future.

I asked a question on FounderDating about whether the law says that my corporation needs to pay me minimum wage. After a long discussion and some conclusions, I thanked everyone and pointed to the web page that says what we’re up to – political accountability. One person showed he actually read the page and replied:

“… just a quick note to congratulate you on setting your sights on a really important topic. I had been thinking of how to address the problem of accountability once upon a time before getting distracted by other things, and I’m really glad to see this being picked up.”

Something really important:  Accountability

Wow- I’m so glad he noticed how important accountability is! To me, accountability is crucial. In fact, one of the things I want is for all of YOU to hold ME accountable for fixing democracy!

Similarly, what I’m finding is that politicians WANT us to hold them accountable. They don’t want to be accountable to wealthy donors any more. Most of them don’t want to do any fundraising at all!

They don’t even want to be accountable to parties. The parties are a necessary evil. They came together for one purpose, but they end up taking sides on everything. Most of our states are pretty close to 50/50 Democratic/Republican and progressive/conservative. If the parties were to line up on different sides of everything, we’d have constant stalemate!

Like we have. The parties should organize people to lobby their own representatives and senators. They shouldn’t own the officials.

Most of our politicians went into politics to serve us.  And most of our people want compromise. Today neither are happening.

Accountability to the people will change that. And what I love is that it’s to ALL the people.

The Foundation: We Design our Future

What is the foundation of a government that’s accountable to ALL of us? The foundation is all of us people saying what we want. All of us being in a conversation about what we want for our future. Designing our future, together.

Isn’t that what we want, to have the future we want?

And that makes it clear what government is for. Government is not the protector of the military industrial complex. It’s not the protector of the health insurance industry or the banks. It’s not to push American values on the rest of the world, unless that’s really what we want. Is it?

Government is just us working together to build the future that we want. To build the future that we design together.

Come build that future with us. Donate $2 and put your email address on our announcement list. That’s the price for powerfully moving America forward into a future of our own design.