Why Moslems Are For Peace

I wrote a blog a few days ago noting that most American Moslems want peace, but there may be hundreds of thousands of who think suicide bombing is often justified. We should look into it, not panic. After all, we’ve had very few incidents in the US and most of the millions of Moslems said suicide bombing is not justified.

I read this month-old article that Islam is a Religion of Violence, in which Ayaan Hirsi Ali distinguished three kinds of Moslems.

Moslems of Peace

One kind are reformers, wanting to separate Islam’s moral precepts from politics and adapt Islam to the modern world. The second group she calls Medina Moslems. They follow Mohammed’s teachings from the early days in Medina, when he had few followers and advocated for peace and charity.

Moslems of War

The third kind are Mecca Moslems. In Mecca, Mohammed adopted Jihad. He won battles and gained hundreds, then thousands, then hundreds of thousands of followers and ushered in the golden era of Islam. Something like a third of the Koran is devoted to violence and Jihad.

And this you-tube video shows that a third of the Koran is devoted to violence and Jihad, to killing non-Moslems. How can Moslems seek peace, when their holy book is full of these kinds of teachings?

Mohammed lived in a violent, lawless time. It was ruled by tribes, petty dictators and thugs. Rape and kidnapping were commonplace. Oppression was common. Fighting to impose order was a good idea! And creating a strict moral code like Sharia law was also a good idea, to counter the culture that said lawlessness, rape and sin were good. In this light, the Mohammed of Mecca did great and was justified.

A Peaceful Islam is Suitable to our Modern World

Today, we live in a largely lawful world. Most people live in societies where violence, theft, rape and other sins are illegal. If Mohammed were alive today, in most places he’d be the Mohammed of Medina, a man of peace and wisdom.

What’s Needed Now?

Not everyone is moral. We have large corporations that lie to people, like the oil companies about climate change. We have corporations like Nestle that deprive people of drinking water. We have corporations like Walmart that have forced thousands of stores out of business by paying people substandard wages. And some corporations bully people, like Monsanto, forcing farmers to use their seeds. While these companies seem immoral, at least they are law-abiding. Mohammed would rally us to protest them and pass laws to remedy their injustices, but he wouldn’t advocate violence.

And we have America. While being mostly law-abiding, the Bush administration destabilized the middle east and tortured people in prison. And before that, we overthrew the democratically elected leader of Iran and installed our own. And then we looked the other way when our man in Iraq, Saddam Hussein, declared war on Iran which cost them a million lives over the course of eight years.

Humanity has a ways to go in making a just world. But we’re getting closer. Today, Jihad and Sharia law are a step backward, not a step forward.

And most Moslems today realize this. In Mohammed’s day, the world needed to become lawful before it could become moral. The Mohammed of Mecca was required. A few days ago, 1.5 million Moslems signed an anti-terrorism fatwa in India. Today, it’s the Mohammed of Medina that more and more Moslems are following.

What should we do about radical Moslems?

What should we do about radical Moslems? Some say America should accept no Moslem refugees who are trying to escape the radicals. Others say we should accept many, support peaceful people who are suffering in a region America destabilized. What should we do?

Search this Pew Poll for “suicide” and it says 81% of US Moslems think suicide bombing is never justified. Yay! But 1% say it’s justified often! 7% say sometimes! 5% say rarely. Estimates are that the US has 5-8 million Moslems, so about 50,000 American Moslems say suicide bombing is often justified, and 350,000 say sometimes – that’s worrisome! (And this article has some figures for other countries, too.) 

I love that our leaders say we shouldn’t panic and we shouldn’t harass Moslems. These 81% seem to express mainstream opinions.

But shouldn’t we acknowledge the rest? Shouldn’t we do more research? Who do they think the suicide bombers should bomb? If it’s invaders of Mecca, maybe that’s okay. If it’s US forces or the enemies of ISIS, we may have a problem.

Do we have a Problem?

My dad sometimes says, “Nuke ’em” about some evil country or another. Mainly it’s an expression. Even if it’s a real opinion, he’ll never hurt anyone. So maybe many, or all, of those “suicide bombings are justified” opinions are harmless. And, maybe some are saying it to provoke us. The US destabilized Iraq, then created ISIS in our prisons which has destabilized Syria. Maybe they answer that way because they think we deserve some discomfort. We don’t know.

We don’t know, but not talking about this seems wrong. It inflames those who are prone to panic. Why can’t we publicly admit the way things are?

Are they so different from Christians?

And maybe contrast it with Christians. Christians in America kill more people than Moslems- here’s an article about ten of them. But that’s not surprising- in a country of 330 million people, there are bound to be a few crazies. Christians were bloodthirsty conquerers throughout the middle ages. They burned witches and owned and often abused slaves into the 1860’s. But then so did southern Jews, too…

More recently, Christians destabilized Iraq and created ISIS in our prisons with torture…

Plus, 44% of Republicans favor turning America into a Christian theocracy, 32% of all Americans! (This is the original PPP poll results page.) That seems crazy- it’s certainly un-American. And then there’s the kind of radical anti-abortion rhetoric by people like Ted Cruz that seems to have provoked the terrorism against Planned Parenthood.

What should we do about radical Moslems? Let’s not see them where they don’t exist. Let’s not pretend they exist. Let’s not pretend they don’t exist. Let’s not pretend they’re worse than radical Christians, Jews, atheists and others. We should not over-react. We should relax, be moral and be vigilant. Let’s work through this together.

Women’s Rights Movement: What Are the Issues?

Just how much do you know about how our current political and economic system is treating women?

Surprisingly, the women’s rights movement is something many of our politically and civically engaged citizens aren’t well-versed on. Women made such huge gains in the last half century in America, it’s easy to think it was enough. But the oppression of an entire gender is a huge and complex problem, and often a subtle one, masked by both our biases and often, competing concerns. This movement calls for equality for half of the planet’s entire population, and it deserves just as much attention as hot-button political topics making headlines today, like gun rights or the economy.

So just what are the major topics in the women’s rights movement? Here’s a quick guide to the most important issues facing the women’s rights movement today: Continue reading

Change.org’s Most Successful E-Petitions

If you’ve been online any time in the past few years, chances are you’ve seen–or signed–a Change.org petition. The site allows anyone to start their own online campaigns or e-petitions, which anyone can view and sign with an electronic signature of support.

The site asks petitioners three simple questions: Who do you want to petition? What do you want them to do? Why is this important? The platform, founded in 2007, allows everyday citizens to exercise their voice to gather support and affect change across a number of spheres–from human rights to the environment to health care. Continue reading

Should The Federal Government Be the Universal Solution?

After Superstorm Sandy hit the U.S., we saw an outpouring of support from governmental entities such as FEMA. However, there were also suggestions that each state should fend for itself. In fact, former presidential candidate Governor Mitt Romney even suggested states should take responsibility for their own disaster responses. This would mean halting any assistance from the federal government, even if states don’t have funds to pay for relief.

Should federal government assistance be the solution to all our problems, like disaster relief? Can issues like climate change, health care, and women’s rights only be solved with the help of a larger power? Or are there actions we can take to make things better on the state or local levels? Continue reading

Is the U.S. a True Democracy?

Democracy.

We hear the word time and time again. President Obama reminded us of the importance of a commitment to democracy in his latest inaugural address:

“Each time we gather to inaugurate a president, we bear witness to the enduring strength of our Constitution. We affirm the promise of our democracy. We recall that what binds this nation together is not the colors of our skin or the tenets of our faith or the origins of our names. What makes us exceptional – what makes us American – is our allegiance to an idea, articulated in a declaration made more than two centuries ago.” Continue reading

On Taxes: What Should Your Government Do?

Taxes have always been a topic of much debate when it comes to government. There seem to be never-ending discussions of what the best solution would be for improving wealth distribution and fueling economic growth. All of this begs the question: what should your government do when it comes to taxes?

We’ve already discussed whether or not the U.S. income tax system is fair. Let’s take a look at the ways various governments handle taxes in their countries, and what that means for citizens at large. Continue reading

Do Tax Breaks Boost the Economy?

Tax breaks. You probably hear the term a lot. For about 30 years, tax breaks for the wealthy have been the crux of the Republican party plan to stimulate economic growth. But do tax breaks really boost the economy, or is it all heresay?

The issue is one of much debate. Nonpartisan Congressional Research Service has found evidence determining that tax breaks for the wealthy do not, in fact, stimulate economic growth. But the top U.S. income tax rate is at the lowest level since the mid-1940s. In 2011, Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney paid 14.1 percent in taxes on an income of $13.7 million. So what’s the rub? Continue reading

4 Things That Make Bipartisanship Difficult to Achieve

At best, “bipartisanship” seems to be nothing but an empty promise in America. In a two-party system like the one in the United States, bipartisanship means a willingness to compromise to reach an agreeable solution on key political issues. But lately, we haven’t seen much of this from our government.

So the question is: Why are we seeing so much failure when it comes to compromise among this country’s leaders? Is the future of bipartisanship dismal, or can Americans still work to ensure we reach the best solutions for everyone?

These are all questions I have when considering bipartisanship and whether or not we can achieve it. In the U.S, it’s clear that our political leaders have problems with this. Bipartisanship appears to work in theory, but we rarely see it in practice. Here are four things that are making bipartisanship difficult to achieve in the modern U.S.: Continue reading

4 Ways to Achieve True Bipartisanship

Bipartisanship…the stance many politicians claim to have, but rarely adopt in full. I often wonder why it’s so hard to work together to achieve a collective goal: improving the lives of constituents. Ultimately, many leaders got into this business to help others. Why is it so hard to make it happen on a larger scale?

We all have different stances and opinions. However, when those stances and opinions become rigid and righteous, cooperation is almost impossible. Further, what does it say when 70 percent of Americans believe there needs to be a new party dedicated to compromise, conciliation, fiscal discipline, and economic growth that draws on the best ideas from both sides?   Continue reading