We can Learn about Political Accountability by Using It

Issues and culture are not simple. PeopleCount proposes a pretty simple system, but many Americans find it easy to misunderstand. This is because we don’t use the word “accountability” very much in politics except when there’s a mistake or corruption. But you’ll be able to use PeopleCount easily even without understanding it at first. As you use it, you’ll naturally learn about political accountability.

Examples of learning by using

It’s sort of like electricity. Much of it is pretty simple. But it took humanity a long time to understand, because humans didn’t understand the nature of atoms and electric charge, nor “force at a distance,” like gravity and electric charge and magnetism. But once we did, it became easier. Now, we all use it and accept it. Not all of us understand the details, but we all use it easily and naturally throughout our lives.

A bicycle is another good example. Figuring out how a bicycle balances is complex, if you’re working with paper and pencil (I did this in college physics courses.) And when someone first gets on a bike, it seems impossible. But once it starts moving fast enough, almost everyone learns how to balance on it. And now it makes sense to almost every culture that bicycles are widely useful.

My writing seems complex

Partly, my writing seems complex because we have an incomplete, primitive notion of “political accountability.” I’m bright, with math and science and computer programming education and degrees. As a computer engineer, I deal with some concepts most people find unthinkable. Plus, my thinking easily gets very precise about language. My brain often corrects my (and other people’s) words when we describe something important, but our words for it are approximate.

This is how it is with political accountability. If you read my definition of it, you’ll see it’s a richer than how we usually think of it.

It’s hard to want something that has never existed

Like electricity and other things that grew easy to understand once we used it, political accountability will become easier to understand.  Right now, it’s a foreign concept. In our political system, there’s no way for our leaders and lawmakers to deliver accountability daily. We want accountability, but we don’t realize we need it in the form of actions, both for us and for our leaders.

Here’s an analogy. We wanted light in our homes, but we didn’t know we needed switches and bulbs and electricity. Plus either wiring and a grid or batteries and ways to charge them. We’re complaining about lack of political accountability like we complained about lack of light. It’ll take a bit of work to make and use the system, but like electricity and lights, it’ll transform society completely.

Learn about political accountability by using it

When Edison invented the electric light bulb, it was hard to understand and it changed nothing. And it took a lot of changes. Factories had to make these new “bulbs” and more wire and stores had to sell them and much much more. But as people used it, it became accepted. We learned by using it. And it transformed our lives and society.

PeopleCount is beginning that with political accountability. With your help, it can happen. Add your email address to our announcement list and we’ll invite you to the beta.

Problem Solving in Politics requires Exploration and Not-Knowing

This entry is part 1 of 2 in the series Problem Solving

Fixing politics requires problem-solving. With a perplexing problem, that usually requires exploration and giving up the notion that we understand the problem. We must bring some not-knowing to it.

Problem solving begins with exploration

When I approached politics, I had no idea what I would find or where my efforts would lead. In the beginning, I just tried to get involved in politics. I wasn’t even intentionally problem-solving. I was just exploring. I had let go of my resignation about politics and I tried newly to make my voice heard. But I couldn’t. It was frustrating. There seemed to be lots of people and things to blame.

The main breakthrough occurred when I gave up trying to use our political system. Instead, I asked myself and others: What do we really want? The easy answer was “results.” But the desired results are different to different people. What desires could we agree on? A better political system. What would that look like? Our officials being accountable to us. That rang true.

Problem solving often means admitting we don’t know

So I looked for accountability. What was that? I realized I wanted it, but I wasn’t clear on what it meant, especially in politics. Research revealed no one in our culture was talking about it. There were a few interesting definitions of political accountability, but not from an operational point of view.

So I realized two things. There was little operational accountability in our political system. And we didn’t see it as a problem because we hadn’t really thought about what accountability would look like if we had it in politics. With our very fuzzy ideas about it, we assumed it just happened during elections. When it didn’t happen, we blamed politicians and parties and the wealthy and lots of other things.

Not-knowing is rare in politics

Letting go of what we think we already know seems to be very rare in politics. Perhaps it’s because politics is so important. It determines how fair and just our society is, and how safe we are and whether we’re prospering.

I had been moderately informed about politics for years and thought it was full of problems. But mostly I was learning about what was wrong or who was to blame. And it was always inside a specific problem area. I was furious at Bush for lying to get us into a war, mismanaging both wars, Congress agreeing to spend trillions on them, and the Middle East being destabilized. My anger and blame didn’t lead to a solution.

Lots of people have written books about various political problems. Most stay on the surface of problems. Some dig deeper and find more pervasive symptoms. Some even find egregious behavior and people to blame. But that kind of problem solving only works well if you happen to be right about what you’re looking for. In politics, we’re so fixated on who or what is to blame, we miss the truth.

In the next article, we’ll look at a key to finding truth- identifying context.